An exposé is intended to inform readers about the topic, structure and procedure of a scientific work. Although the exposé should cover only a few pages, the creation can take more time and effort than writing a whole chapter of a master’s or bachelor’s thesis. Because for a meaningful Exposé more is needed than the study of some books. The time spent on the exposé, however, is well invested because the whole fate of the work depends on it: an exposé that does not convince its readers can, at best, lead to a second chance, namely to request a major overhaul , It can also lead to a complete rejection of the project.
Instead, the emphasis is on the continuous improvement of one’s own knowledge: thoughts are developed, compared with the theoretical and empirical state of research, and, if necessary, suggestions from other fields of research are considered and reflected. This also includes the sometimes painful discarding of original designs, in the development of which much working time has flowed.
The first step is to find a meaningful basic question that roughly pre-lines the direction of the work. This question does not yet reflect the final research question, which will be asked later in the paper, because there is still a lack of concretization. These are supplemented later, after a study of the theoretical literature, their methods and strategies.
It is helpful to orient yourself to the main concepts of the respective topic and to define them clearly for the work. Only when they – and their relationship to each other – are clarified, the first step is done.
If you want to write a synopsis, you sometimes go to unknown terrain: quickly your own “theory” is announced, which should be “proven” in the work. However, such a formulation quickly – quite rightly – comes up against criticism.
With the Exposé, it is important to convincingly explain the topic of the work, the procedure and the structure. First of all, it has to be explained why the work should actually be written: Perhaps there is a research gap to be filled, perhaps a theoretical approach should be examined on the basis of a new research subject.
Granted, you do not have to read Thomas S. Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” to get an outline for a master’s thesis – though it certainly will help. What should be noted in any case, is the correct use of the terms.
Concise precision and precision are essential in the preparation of the exposé, since this is how the basic structure of the work is built: it makes sense to list those concepts and definitions already at this early stage on which the later work is written. Especially in terms that are also used in general parlance, and that seem to be clear, there are sometimes different, sometimes conflicting definitions in science. The definition of one of these definitions often already includes a pre-structuring, perhaps even an anticipatory name of the results of the work: For example, who writes about “education” must first decide on how he would like to understand the term: as a humanistic ideal Influences thinking and acting? From the perspective of everyday or professional life? From the perspective of humanity, society, the state or the individual?
Questions such as these are usually only the prelude to a whole series of decisions that need to be made long before writing the paper. In general, it is helpful to entrust experienced authors or ghostwriters with the creation of an exposé: The subsequent work is thus not only steered in the right direction, but also massively relieved. And in contrast to the topic of “writing a master thesis” or “having a bachelor thesis written”, creating an exposé by ghostwriters is legally unobjectionable, especially as no explanation is required here about independent writing.